Liberalization of trade in services & Protection of public services

Will public services be safeguarded in CETA?

Liberalisation of trade in services requires strong safeguards in order to make sure the ability of public authorities to deliver high-quality services is not undermined in any way. In CETA, European and Canadian negotiators decided to rely on a so-called negative list, in which the Parties created sectoral exclusions on services they do not intend to liberalise. Usually, “positive lists” are used: in this framework: the legislators explicitly list the services they wish to open to liberalisation, thus maintaining a better control on public services, including services that will emerge in the future. This is not the case in CETA. Provisions relating to trade in services are entailed in Chapter 9.

Télécharger (PDF, 135KB)

Télécharger (PDF, 125KB)

Pro and Cons

PROS

on trade in services  

http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/#streamlining 

On public services and contracts 

http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/#public-contracts

CONS EPSU briefing on CETA

Public Services under attack, Thomas Fritz for EPSU and other organisations

Leave a Reply